Shepherd bill would nullify most EPA regulations - The Lewiston Tribune: Blogs

Welcome!
|
Log out?|
Logout||dashboard

Shepherd bill would nullify most EPA regulations

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:00 am

Legislation introduced Thursday by Rep. Paul Shepherd, R-Riggins, would nullify most Environmental Protection Agency regulations in Idaho.

Shepherd said he brought the bill at the request of several suction dredge miners.

It appears the EPA bureaucracy has an agenda in its interpretation of what pollution is,” he said. “They're saying if you pick up sand with a suction dredge, run it through and dump it back in the water, that's pollution. It's pretty much shutting (the dredgers) down. That's the main thing driving this, but the bill pertains to any regulations not approved by the people.”

Members of the House State Affairs committee questioned the legality of the measure, but agreed it's a topic worthy of discussion.

Shepherd said he has asked the Attorney General's Office for an opinion on the legality of his bill, but hasn't heard back yet.

The measure states that “the regulation authority of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is not authorized by the Constitution and … is hereby declared to be invalid in the state of Idaho.”

The bill doesn't nullify regulations approved by Congress, Shepherd said, but does nullify regulations created by the EPA alone to implement legislation like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts.

Rep. Eric Anderson, R-Priest Lake, agreed the suction dredge issue needs to be addressed, but wasn't sure this was the right approach.

I hope this doesn't undermine efforts to find a solution,” he said. “Also, we codified many of these regulations into state law when we took primacy over the EPA programs, so this bill would be nullifying state law at the same time.”

Rep. Lynn Luker, a Boise attorney, wondered if Shepherd's bill really accomplishes anything.

How does it protect miners from the federal government imposing a fine (for a pollution discharge), since that process can go through federal court?” he asked. “I'm struggling to see how, in practical terms, this will protect our businesses.”

Idaho is unusual in that the Legislature ultimately approves all rules and regulations needed to implement state policies. Agencies adopt preliminary rules, but then run them past lawmakers at the beginning of every session.

Congress doesn't follow that practice. Consequently, the EPA and other agencies can adopt rules that never actually get approved by elected representatives.

That's the problem – Congress isn't asserting its authority to look at these rules,” said Rep. Tom Loertscher, R-Iona. “I think what Representative Shepherd is getting at are the regulations that aren't in the law or that greatly exceed the intent. Agriculture is facing lots of things like that with the Clean Air Act that can't begin to complied with. So I understand why he's bringing this. It's worthy of discussion.”

Now that the bill has been introduced, it could be brought back to committee for a public hearing.

 

 

© 2016 The Lewiston Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • newsjunkie posted at 2:36 pm on Thu, Feb 6, 2014.

    newsjunkie Posts: 20372

    EPA regulations apply equally over the entire US. One state does not get to decide on their own that they don't have to comply with EPA regulations.

     
  • SamuelAdams posted at 2:41 pm on Mon, Feb 24, 2014.

    SamuelAdams Posts: 1

    Thanks to Rep. Loertscher for taking the initial step in fighting the tyranny that has become the EPA. They routinely exert power and authority never foreseen when it was created. The EPA defines and interprets terms and then creates regulations based upon their interpretations and then enforces those regulations. They are in reality legislators, executives and final judge/arbiter of their self-created "laws".
    The organization is run by radical environmentalists who are without any balance.
    And, as to the EPA regulations having force in all states, not just one ... so what? Tyranny is wrong regardless of whether it is imposed on 1 or 300+ million.
    The EPA = Tyranny.

     

Online poll

Loading…

National Video - Editor's Picks

National Video - Editor's Picks

Connect with us